Skip to main content
7 min read Implementation

Measuring Genuine Implementation Progress

Explain the distinction between completed, ongoing and not-yet-started activities, and why progress should be assessed against evidence rather than announcements alone.

Post-TRRC Unit Logo

Post-TRRC Unit

Monitoring & Evaluation Division · Ministry of Justice

Share
Institutional coordination session reviewing security and public sector reforms
Photo: Post-TRRC Unit / Ministry of Justice, The Gambia

Moving beyond announcements to verifiable results

In public discussions, progress is often conflated with ministerial statements or legislative drafting milestones. True transitional justice progress, however, must be measured by changes in the lives of victims and the governance of institutions.

Tracking requires empirical indicators: whether victims have received medical surgeries, whether security vetting mechanisms are operational, and whether court dockets are progressing toward trial.

“Activity is not the same as outcome. Meaningful progress requires institutional evidence.”
Moving beyond announcements to verifiable results
Implementation Archive · Ministry of Justice

The Three Status Classifications

The Implementation Plan uses rigorous status criteria to evaluate commitments. "Completed" signifies that the statutory or administrative action is fully enacted and active.

"Ongoing" reflects processes currently underway—such as legislative review, regional consultations, or forensic exhumations. "Not-yet-started" flags areas where financial, political, or institutional preconditions have delayed commencement.

Tags: #Monitoring #Evidence-Based Progress #Indicators #Accountability